View Issue Details

IDProjectCategoryView StatusLast Update
0001636T99X171.00 SKB EaglexTS certificationpublic2023-05-29 09:24
Reporter(SW) Jason LingAssigned To(ALTech) JunGyu Kim Due Date
PrioritynormalSeveritys4-minorReproducibilityalways
Status closedResolutionfixed 
Summary0001636: [Smart3][ATV12] Please let us know how to verify app list sorting
DescriptionHi JunGyu,

Please check the following requirement,
Verify that the apps are displayed in recency or alphabetical or user edited order for non out-of-the-box case.

As far as I know, this function works fine in older Android 9/10. we can press blue button to pop dialog, the dialog will show the option (sorting option).

I don't know the current display mode (5.3.7). (Is recency the default?)
I opened the app at the last position in the app row, then press home and then go to the app list again, the app I pressed before is still at the last position.

I plug-out the eth cable, then screen show the off-line UI (Native UI), then I pressed the blue key
the screen pop up the dialog, I select the first option, "most recently used"
then I insert then eth cable and re-test again. it works fine.

Could you check it with Digicap. It seems that the default mode has some issues with the online UI (WebUI).

Thanks,
Jason
TagsNo tags attached.
Attach Tags

Users monitoring this issue

Activities

(ALTech) JunGyu Kim

2023-02-02 17:21

developer   ~0011989

Hi Jason,

I reported this issue to Digicap. (https://jira.skbroadband.com/browse/FSTB12-77)
I will let you know if any update.

Thank you.
Kim

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-09 18:16

developer   ~0012106

Hi Jason

I'm a little confused.
- When the network is disconnected, the popup screen is a native UI screen, it has an app sorting function (blue button).
- HomeUI > Games & Apps , the Apps screen is a web menu.
  app sorting function has never been implemented in the web menu.
  https://jira.skbroadband.com/browse/FSTB12-77

So the previous ATV10 FW was also approved by Google.
Is there any change in this requirement in ATV12?

Thank you
YK.Jung

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-09 19:22

developer   ~0012107

Last edited: 2023-02-09 19:27

Hi YK,

No change in this requirement. I just want to know how to verify this item
If we don't go to the native UI to select the sorting type, what is the default sorting type ?
1. most recently used
2. Alphabet

My test steps is as follows,
1. Open the 4th app,
2. Press Home
3. Go to app list, the app I opened (4th) before is still in the 4th position (Fail)
4. Reboot
5. Go to app list, the app I opened (4th) before is still in the 4th position (Fail)
6. Plug out ethernet, Press blue button in Native UI, Select first option (most recently used)
7. Insert ethernet, then Press Home
8. Go to app list, the app I opened (4th) before will go to the 1th position (Pass)
9. Press the 3rd app then Press Home
10. Go to app list, the app I opened before in Step 9 (3rd) will go to the 1th position (Pass)

I think the problem is there is no default until we go to the native UI to enable it.
I suspect our 3PL didn't check it before in ATV9/10 carefully, maybe their vpn network is not stable, so they test it in NativeUI.

Thanks,
Jason

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-13 09:55

developer   ~0012136

Hi Jason

I translated only the necessary parts of the documents I received from SKB.
information about app sorting operating as default is as follows:
 google_app_list.PNG

please check it

Thank you
YK.Jung
google_app_list.PNG (92,282 bytes)   
google_app_list.PNG (92,282 bytes)   

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-13 10:12

developer   ~0012140

Hi YK,

My question is according to the requirement,

apps and games list MUST be displayed in one of the following orders
Recency (last-used app or game is moved to the first position in the list)
Alphabetical order
Order edited by user

I think SKB already implemented Recency and Alphabetical order.
But what is the default type of sorting?

In my test, there is no default type until I go to Native UI to config it.

The picture you attached is Out-of-Box requirement, but when user start to use app or reboot the device, I think there must be a type as follows,
Recency (last-used app or game is moved to the first position in the list)
Alphabetical order
Order edited by user

Thanks,
Jason
order.png (27,450 bytes)   
order.png (27,450 bytes)   

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-16 11:23

developer   ~0012193

Hi Jason

The requirement you are talking about has never been reported by any other manufacturer.

To be clear
After removing the LAN cable, I set sorting with blue key and captured the game & app list screen after connect LAN cable
1: default
2: 최신사용순 last-used app
3: 가나다 > ABC 순
4: ABC > 가나다 순
When I tested it, sorting function is applied only to "구글 앱:Google app" list at app lists screen
Other apps lists are fixed due to AWS regardless of sorting setting ( please check image.png )

at here
1) 구글 앱 : Google app list
   In the case of the "Google app" list,I think there will be no problem
   
2) Other apps lists ( TV 게임 list / 키즈 list / 카드&보드게임 list / 라이프 & 엔터 list )
   Currently, it is fixed due to AWS.
   Is Google requirement met if these lists are sorted "Alphabetical order" or "Recency" ?

Please let me know if there is anything I misunderstand.

Thank you
YK.Jung
image.png (499,464 bytes)

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-16 11:57

developer   ~0012194

Hi YK,

>>The requirement you are talking about has never been reported by any other manufacturer.
The requirement (order.png) I attached before is from Custom Launcher Requirements
This test items in SmokeTest (c-launcher-spec-check) ask tester to check the Custom Launcher Requirements, Please refer to c-launcher-spec-check.jpg

How does other manufacturer verify this item?


>>To be clear
>>After removing the LAN cable, I set sorting with blue key and captured the game & app list screen after connect LAN cable
1: default
2: 최신사용순 last-used app
3: 가나다 > ABC 순
4: ABC > 가나다 순

I have one question, I tested 15.537.8 + webui (dev + v534)
I only see 3 options, Please see the attachments. (sorting_type.png)

>> Currently, it is fixed due to AWS.
>> Is Google requirement met if these lists are sorted "Alphabetical order" or "Recency" ?
We only care about the first row.
The first row is app & games lists. the other row is recommended list (not installed in STB)

Thanks,
Jason
sorting_type.png (122,704 bytes)   
sorting_type.png (122,704 bytes)   
c-launcher-spec-check.jpg (93,098 bytes)   
c-launcher-spec-check.jpg (93,098 bytes)   

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-17 08:33

developer   ~0012214

Hi Jason

I checked, the sorting option was recorded in btv_home/config/tvservice-system-properties.xml when I tested it.
      <entry key="PROPERTY_APP_AND_GAME_SORT">APP_SORT_DEFAULT</entry>
      <entry key="PROPERTY_APP_AND_GAME_SORT">APP_SORT_KOR</entry>
      <entry key="PROPERTY_APP_AND_GAME_SORT">APP_SORT_ENG</entry>
      <entry key="PROPERTY_APP_AND_GAME_SORT">APP_SORT_LATEST_USED</entry>

      and the UI allows the user to see below three sort options.
      1: 최신사용순 last-used app (APP_SORT_LATEST_USED)
      2: 가나다 > ABC 순 (APP_SORT_KOR)
      3: ABC > 가나다 순 (APP_SORT_ENG)

      This is when the user has never used the sort option (initial value)
      4 : APP_SORT_DEFAULT

      That is , there are four options when checked by code, and only three options are displayed in the UI.

In the case of INTEK, he is not aware of this content at all.
      and he didn't know that there was a sorting function.
      So I told he this information.
      After a brief check, he is asking me again that there will be no problem if it is always displayed in the order below.
      1. Play Store, 2. Play Movies & TV, 3. YouTube, 4. YouTube Music, and 5. Play Games. .. etc on..
      That is , INTEK expect that there will be no problem if the sorting option change is not applied to web ui screen.

Thank you
YK.Jung

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-17 08:43

developer   ~0012215

Hi YK,

 >>1. Play Store, 2. Play Movies & TV, 3. YouTube, 4. YouTube Music, and 5. Play Games. .. etc on..
This requirement is for out of box,

when user start using app, the launcher should also follow the following requirement as below,
Recency (last-used app or game is moved to the first position in the list)
Alphabetical order
Order edited by user

Thanks,
Jason

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-17 08:53

developer   ~0012217

Hi YK,

One thing i think we can try to convince 3PL is the APP_SORT_DEFAULT is out of box value.

After user change the sorting type, they can NOT set Back to "APP_SORT_DEFAULT " value.
So the sorting type will BE displayed one of following order.
Recency (last-used app or game is moved to the first position in the list)
Alphabetical order

I just discussed it with our engineer who is in charge of other project's customer launcher
What he cares about is if there is a place that clearly prompts the user how to modify the sorting type. (the offline/native UI is NOT obvious)
How do users know it?

Thanks,
Jason

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-20 19:17

developer   ~0012268

HI Jason

FYI, Looking at webUI dev/534, the app list has changed slightly unlike before

Anyway , no other manufacturer has commented on the app sorting.
Only FXN is raising this issue.

What is the simplest way to solve this issue?
( I don't know what to do )

Should I ask the native UI to make one more menu where user can select APP_SORT_DEFAULT ?

Thank you
YK.Jung

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-20 19:29

developer   ~0012270

>>Anyway , no other manufacturer has commented on the app sorting.
>>Only FXN is raising this issue.
Because they didn't check the documents carefully

>>What is the simplest way to solve this issue?
The currently question is how does user know the sorting function. I think we can try to convince 3PL is the APP_SORT_DEFAULT is out of box value.
if user want to sort by Recency or Alphabetical order. They can go to offline mode and press blue button.

But, 3PL will ask the following question.

How do users know? Did you write it on user guide or web site ?
If Digicap is currently unable to fix it, Did SKB mention the method (offline + blue button) on user guide or on Smart3 web site ?

Thanks
Jason

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-21 14:54

developer   ~0012279

Hi Jason

SKB reviewed the customer launcher's specifications and said they don't know where the violation is.
( there is no content to notify the user)
and I don't think this will be an critical issue.

If it is not a blocking issue, it would be better to skip this situation.
(The current UI is almost impossible to modify. )

Thanks
YK.Jung

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-21 15:51

developer   ~0012284

Hi YK,

>>said they don't know where the violation is.
in our opinion
The out-of-box MUST be >> APP_SORT_DEFAULT (it's OK)
When user start use to app, apps and games list "MUST" be displayed in one of the following orders
Recency (last-used app or game is moved to the first position in the list)
Alphabetical order
Order edited by user

if 3PL check carefully, they will ask us, why the sorting type NOT belongs as follows,
Recency (last-used app or game is moved to the first position in the list)
Alphabetical order
Order edited by user

At that time, we think we can try to convince 3PL is that the APP_SORT_DEFAULT is out of box value.
if user want to sort by Recency or Alphabetical order. They need to go to offline mode and press blue button.

But, 3PL will ask the following question.
How do users know? Does SKB write it on user guide or web site ? We have been asked similar questions before.
if SKB already write it on user guide or web site, we think we can convince 3PL.

Thanks,
Jason

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-21 17:47

developer   ~0012289

Hi Jason

SKB showed me the customer launcher check list screen.
There are no items to check for sorting-functions.

In other words, the part you are talking about is not on the checklist.
Or is the part you request not in the checklist, but does 3PL always check?
Did I miss anything?

Thanks
YK.Jung
image-2.png (91,406 bytes)   
image-2.png (91,406 bytes)   

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-21 19:24

developer   ~0012293

Last edited: 2023-02-21 19:33

Hi YK,

Item 4
Verify that the apps are displayed in recency or alphabetical or user edited order for non out-of-the-box case

In other world, after user start using app/reboot device (it will go to non out-of-the-box case)
The apps MUST be displayed in
1. recency
2. alphabetical
3. user edited order

Thanks,
Jason

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-02-21 20:19

developer   ~0012294

Hi Jason

I asked SKB manager to put the information in the User Guide,
but SKB manager says it is almost impossible.

How about this one?
"If a user wants to use the feature, user can hear the description of the feature through the SKB consultation call."

Thank you
YK.Jung

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-02-21 20:24

developer   ~0012296

Hi YK,

How about this one?
"If a user wants to use the feature, user can hear the description of the feature through the SKB consultation call."

I will guide 3PL to test this function, if 3PL ask us "how does user know it"
I will reply "user can call the SKB support center hotline for consultation."

Thanks,
Jason

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-03-08 16:01

developer   ~0012468

Hi YK,

Our QA has checked the sorting function on 15.537.16

Sorting behavior is different than before

Reproduce steps:
1. Plug out ethernet cable and Go to offline mode
2. Press blue key and choice Recency mode
3. Open an app
4. Press Home
5. Go to app list

Previous version (small icon)
The application will move to the 1st position

Current version (large app icon)
The application will move the 6th position.
=> Looks like the first five app position are fixed.

Could you confirm it?

Thanks,
Jason

(ALTech) Younkwang Jung

2023-03-08 16:49

developer   ~0012471

Hi Jason

When I tested it at app list , the webUI fixed the order of the first five apps position regardless of sorting

Thanks
YK.Jung

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-03-09 08:54

developer   ~0012476

Hi YK,

so the digicap changed the design right?
I just need to confirm this.

Thanks,
Jason

(SW) Jason Ling

2023-05-29 09:24

developer   ~0013251

Hi all,

We've passed ATV12 LR certification, so I close this issue.

Thanks,
Jason

Issue History

Date Modified Username Field Change
2023-02-02 15:41 (SW) Jason Ling New Issue
2023-02-02 15:41 (SW) Jason Ling Status new => assigned
2023-02-02 15:41 (SW) Jason Ling Assigned To => (ALTech) JunGyu Kim
2023-02-02 15:42 (SW) Jason Ling Issue Monitored: (SW) Kerwin Chen
2023-02-02 15:42 (SW) Jason Ling Issue Monitored: (ALTech) Younkwang Jung
2023-02-02 15:42 (SW) Jason Ling Issue Monitored: (SW) Sam Yang
2023-02-02 17:21 (ALTech) JunGyu Kim Note Added: 0011989
2023-02-09 18:16 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012106
2023-02-09 19:22 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012107
2023-02-09 19:22 (SW) Jason Ling Note Edited: 0012107
2023-02-09 19:27 (SW) Jason Ling Note Edited: 0012107
2023-02-13 09:55 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012136
2023-02-13 09:55 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung File Added: google_app_list.PNG
2023-02-13 10:12 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012140
2023-02-13 10:12 (SW) Jason Ling File Added: order.png
2023-02-16 11:23 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012193
2023-02-16 11:23 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung File Added: image.png
2023-02-16 11:57 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012194
2023-02-16 11:57 (SW) Jason Ling File Added: sorting_type.png
2023-02-16 11:57 (SW) Jason Ling File Added: c-launcher-spec-check.jpg
2023-02-17 08:33 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012214
2023-02-17 08:43 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012215
2023-02-17 08:53 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012217
2023-02-20 19:17 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012268
2023-02-20 19:29 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012270
2023-02-21 14:54 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012279
2023-02-21 15:51 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012284
2023-02-21 17:47 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012289
2023-02-21 17:47 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung File Added: image-2.png
2023-02-21 19:24 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012293
2023-02-21 19:33 (SW) Jason Ling Note Edited: 0012293
2023-02-21 20:19 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012294
2023-02-21 20:24 (SW) Jason Ling Status assigned => resolved
2023-02-21 20:24 (SW) Jason Ling Resolution open => fixed
2023-02-21 20:24 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012296
2023-03-08 16:01 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012468
2023-03-08 16:49 (ALTech) Younkwang Jung Note Added: 0012471
2023-03-09 08:54 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0012476
2023-05-29 09:24 (SW) Jason Ling Status resolved => closed
2023-05-29 09:24 (SW) Jason Ling Note Added: 0013251